Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber - Town Hall, Maidenhead. View directions
Contact: Shilpa Manek
The Chairman to welcome all to the Rural Forum.
The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting. All attendees introduced themselves.
APOLOGIES OF ABSENCE
To receive any apologies for absence.
Apologies for absence were received from John Emmett, Richard Simmonds and David Scott.
To receive any declarations of interest.
No Declarations of Interest received.
To agree the minutes of the last meeting.
The minutes of the last meeting were Unanimously Agreed.
ORDER OF ITEMS
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY that the order of items on the Agenda be changed.
RURAL FARM WALK FEEDBACK
The Chairman thanked Mr Rinder and his family for hosting the Rural Farm Walk.
The Chairman highlighted that the next Rural Farm Walk needed to be arranged soon and it was suggested that the press be invited to future Rural Farm Walks.
The Clerk to be informed of where the next Rural Farm Walk would be held.
To receive an update from Mr Nick Philp on issues affecting the farming community.
A presentation was given to the Forum by Mr Nick Philp. Presentation attached will minutes.
Points discussed after the presentation included:
· Due to the amount of rain this year, there had been a poor quality harvest. There had been late grass and milk and butter were in shortage.
· Generally prices had remained stable as a result of the weak pound.
· A question was asked about irrigation and whether it was used. Irrigation was used for fresh produce only, it came at a cost, a licence would be required and 95% of crops are un irrigated.
To receive an update from Thames Valley Police.
Items 7 and 8 were merged to present unauthorised encampments.
A presentation by Lisa Pigeon, Environmental Health Lead, on Unauthorised Encampments.
Lisa Pigeon and Louise Warbrick, both gave a joint presentation on unauthorised encampments. Presentation attached.
Points that were discussed included:
· It was difficult for the police to act if the landowner had not taken any actions first.
· What the code of conduct was.
· For fly tipping, it was the local authority who could prosecute.
· The Environment Authority would only get involved it was significant organised crime.
· Landowners had to prove who the fly tipping was done by.
· It was difficult to act against someone with no address. It was best to keep record and registrations and more people should call the police for them to attend the site.
· If vehicle registrations were recorded and could be tracked going from one site to another, then the police could act.
· During four recent cases of unauthorised encampments, two had been dealt with by the police and were not successful and the other two by bailiffs, this worked better and the land had been cleared within 48 hours.
· Joint working had to be further improved.
· The possibility of alerting the farmers via a NFU representative when they were moving so everyone could be alerted. This could be considered as stalking and that was an offense. A group of farmers were already acting as a watch group but when police and local authority informed, there was no back up or support.
GREEN BELT FOR FARMING
Rural Forum to discuss green belt land used for farming.
Councillor Coppinger, Lead Member for Planning informed the Forum that the Panel wanted to hear the views of the farming committee. Councillor Coppinger introduced Ashley Smith, Deputy Head of Planning to answer any specific questions.
Points raised by the Forum included:
· The borough would like to preserve the green belt land, farmers would like to preserve the most as they use for farming.
· 80% of the borough is countryside.
· Farmers were concerned that not many Members attended the Rural Forum. Wycombe District Council have more commitment to the farmers and many more Members attend the meetings.
· Green belt land was best used for farming.
· Mr Copas asked the Deputy Head of Planning why the three planning applications they had submitted had been refused and at appeal, all costs had been awarded. The applications were for affordable housing. Applicants would like practical support from the planning team. Ashley Smith informed Mr Copas that he would be happy to look into these and speak out of the Forum to Mr Copas.
· Councillor Colin Rayner asked how did it take to determine a planning application. Ashley Smith informed the Forum that the timescales varied depending on the complexity of the application, quality of the submission and whether any additional information/evidence was required.
· Councillor Colin Rayner reminded Rural Forum Members that they can approach their Ward Councillor, Parish Council and could also consult planning for advice. Ashley Smith confirmed that pre application advice was always available. The timescale for a response was five to six weeks.
· Mr Copas informed the Forum that the pre application advice was very useful, however a time line to responses would be very helpful. Copas Farms had asked for pre application advise in December 2016 and were still awaiting a response. Members were not impressed with this information. Councillor David Evans informed the Forum that if no response was received, Ward Councillors should be contacted.
· It was always difficult to speak to the planning officers.
· Better communication was required.
· Nick Philp asked what happened to the S106 funds and suggested that the council be more transparent. Ashley Smith informed the Forum that a record is maintained of how it is gathered and spent.
· CIL was discussed and if this was a consideration when planning applications were permitted. It was explained that this was not a consideration and that all developments paid monies towards CIL that paid towards infrastructure and housing. CIL was important but it was not a determining factor.
· Councillor Beer discussed the north, south divide and that there was more pressure on the south for housing.
· The north of the borough had many large houses, more smaller properties were required for working people. Through the Local Borough Plan, there would be many more smaller homes, both social housing and affordable private housing.
· The council to consider that with the rapid expansion of residents, leisure facilities should be supported.
· Are there any ways to restrict smaller houses extending to become large houses in planning policy. Ashley Smith informed ... view the full minutes text for item 9.
DATES OF FUTURE MEETINGS
The date of the next Rural Forum is :
Tuesday 6 March 2018 at 5.30pm at the Guildhall, Windsor
Forum Members noted that the next meeting was on 6 March 2018 at 5.30pm in the Guildhall.