Adult, Community Services and Health Overview and Scrutiny Panel
Tuesday 5 May 2009
Web Agenda/Minutes Summary Document
Meeting Name:
Adult, Community Services and Health Overview and Scrutiny Panel
Meeting Date:
05/05/2009 Pick
Meeting Time:
Location:
Sub Committee / User Forum etc (if required):
Members Present:
Non-Members Present:
Confidentiality: Part I
Document Type: Agenda
Document Status: Final
O F
M E E T I N G
ADULT, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HEALTH
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL
will meet on
at
7.30pm
in the
COUNCIL CHAMBER, TOWN HALL, MAIDENHEAD
TO: MEMBERS OF THE ADULT, COMMUNITY SERVICES & HEALTH OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL
COUNCILLOR MEADOWCROFT (CHAIRMAN)
COUNCILLOR MRS ENDACOTT (VICE-CHAIRMAN)
COUNCILLORS MRS S EVANS, LENTON, MAJEED, MRS NAPIER & MRS PROCTOR
SUBSTITUTE MEMBERS
COUNCILLORS HERDSON, MRS KEMP, MRS LUXTON, MRS NEWBOUND, PENFOLD, D. WILSON & MRS YONG
Interim Head of Democratic Services
Issued: 27 April 2009
Members of the Press and Public are welcome to attend Part I of this meeting.
The agenda is available on the Council’s web site at www.rbwm.gov.uk or contact the
Panel Administrator Andrew Scott (01628) 796028
In the event of the fire alarm sounding or other emergency, please leave the building quickly and calmly by the nearest exit. Do not stop to collect personal belongings and do not use the lifts. Congregate in the Town Hall Car Park, Park Street, Maidenhead (immediately adjacent to the Town Hall) and do not re-enter the building until told to do so by a member of staff. |
PART I
ITEM | SUBJECT | WARD | PAGE NO |
| APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence | ||
| DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To receive Declarations of Interests from Members of the Panel in respect of any item to be considered at the meeting. | - | |
| MINUTES To confirm the Part I Minutes of the meeting of the Panel held on 3 March 2009. | All | i-v |
| OPTHALMIC RECORDS AT KING EDWARD VII HOSPITAL, WINDSOR To receive an update on the implementation of the new patient records system at the Opthalmic Clinic at King Edward VII Hospital. | Various | - |
| DEVELOPMENT OF ACUTE MEDICINE AND FUTURE PLANS FOR SERVICES AT HEATHERWOOD HOSPITAL - PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTATION To receive details of the consultation on the proposed changes to acute medicine and future plans for services at Heatherwood hospital. | Various | - |
| WINDSOR, ASCOT AND MAIDENHEAD LINk To receive a presentation on the role and current activity of the Windsor, Ascot and Maidenhead LINk. | All | - |
| SUPPORTING PEOPLE STRATEGY 2009/2011 To consider the Draft Supporting People Strategy, which sets the overall vision and objectives of the Supporting People programme locally. | All | 1 |
| SERVICE MONITORING REPORT To consider activity within the Adult, Community Services and Health services during the period to 31 March 2009. | All | 37 |
| SAFEGUARDING ADULTS – ANNUAL REPORT To consider the Safeguarding Adults Annual Report. | All | - |
| ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF ADULT SOCIAL CARE To receive an update on how the key areas for development arising from the annual performance assessment are being addressed. | All | - |
| WORK PROGRAMME The following items are scheduled for discussion at the meeting of the Panel to be held on 7 July 2009.
| All | - |
| LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 – EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC To consider passing the following resolution:- “That under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting whilst discussion takes place on items 13-14 on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of part I of Schedule 12A of the Act" | - | - |
PERSONAL INTERESTS
Say and Stay
If the matter being considered relates to, or is likely to affect, an interest which is in your Register of Interests or, if the issue being discussed affects you more, either positively or negatively, than other people in the Ward to which it relates you must say you have a personal interest but you can stay and take part and vote in the meeting.
This applies if the personal interest affects either:
You
Your partner, relative or a close associate
Your employer or the employer of your partner, relative or close associate
Any corporate body in which you, your partner, relative or close associate hold shares with a nominal value of more than £25,000 or of which you or they are a Director
Any firm in which you, your relative or close associate are partners
You should make the declaration of interest at the beginning of the meeting, or as soon as you are aware that you have an interest in the matter being discussed.
If the matter being discussed concerns or affects one of the following organisations in which you, your relatives or close associates hold a position of control or management, that is:
A body where you or they are a representative or nominee of the Council
A body exercising functions of a public nature
You need only declare your interest if and when you speak on the matter.
A relative should be given a very wide meaning. It includes a partner, (someone you are married to, your civil partner or someone you live with in a similar capacity), a parent, a parent in law, a son or daughter, a stepson or stepdaughter, the child of a partner, a brother or sister, a brother or sister of your partner, a grandparent, a grandchild, an uncle or aunt, a nephew or niece or the partners of any of these people.
PREJUDICAL INTEREST
Withdrawing from Meetings
If a member of the public, who knows all the relevant facts, would view your personal interest in the matter being discussed to be so significant that it is likely to prejudice your judgment of the public interest, and
The matter affects your financial interests or relates to a licensing or regulatory matter (an approval, consent, refusal, licence permission or registration) and
The matter is not within one of the exempt categories
Then you must declare the interest and you should leave the meeting, unless members of the public are allowed to make representations, give evidence, or answer questions about the matter, in which case you may attend the meeting for that purpose only as long as you immediately leave the meeting once you have made your representations.
4. OPTHALMIC RECORDS AT KING EDWARD VII HOSPITAL, WINDSOR
Meetings 090505 Acshosc Medical Records Presentation
5. DEVELOPMENT OF ACUTE MEDICINE AND FUTURE PLANS FOR SERVICES AT HEATHERWOOD HOSPITAL - PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTATION
Information and Consultation Process
- Contents Page
- 1 Purpose of document 2
2 The engagement process so far 3
3 Consulting Organisation 3
4 Information and Consultation Period 3
5 Documents 3
6 Web-sites 4
7 Public meetings 4
8 Engagement Plan 4
9 Independent specialist support 5
10 Quality assurance 5
11 Contingency plans 5
12 Information and Consultation closure and report 6
1. Purpose of document
1.1. Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is planning to reconfigure the distribution of acute medical services between Heatherwood and Wexham Park hospitals. Emergency care will be transferred from Heatherwood Hospital and consolidated at Wexham Park Hospital.
1.2. This change to the distribution of acute medicine services between Heatherwood and Wexham Park hospitals is unavoidable and there are no alternative options. The Trust solicitors advise against conducting a ‘public consultation’ exercise on this matter.
1.3. There are options about the implementation and future services at Heatherwood Hospital. These will be the subject of ‘consultation’.
1.4. Section 242 of the NHS Act 2006 (formerly Section 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001) places a duty on NHS trusts, primary care trusts and strategic health authorities to make arrangements to involve patients and the public in service planning and operation, and in the development of proposals for changes. The Cabinet Office guidelines http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file47158.pdf set out the basic minimum principles for conducting effective consultation. The Department of Health issued guidance on Section 242 in ‘Real Involvement – working with people to improve health services in October 2008.
1.5. Under Section 244 of the NHS Act 2006 the Trust is required to consult with the Overview and Scrutiny Committees (OSC) on any substantial variation to services. This is not the same as a public consultation. In circumstances where there are no options to change the trust is not required to consult on the change itself but on issues including: what do the OSC’s need to know and have an input on and what actions should be undertaken to engage with the public.
1.6. The relevant OSC’s are required to form a joint committee for this purpose. In East Berkshire there is a standing joint committee comprising representative membership of Bracknell Forest Borough Council, The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, Slough Borough Council Overview and Scrutiny Committees.
1.7. The Trust believes there is no material impact on Buckinghamshire residents as a consequence of the proposed changes but is working with the Buckinghamshire County Council Overview & Scrutiny Committee.
1.8. This document describes the engagement process leading up to and including the planned public information and consultation process.
1.9. This document does not seek to describe the proposed changes, as these will be contained within the information and consultation document ‘Saving More Lives – improving services for emergency medical patients.
2. The engagement process so far
2.1. Heatherwood & Wexham Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has worked jointly with Berkshire East PCT on the ‘Right Care, Right Place’ programme since 2004 to develop health services in east Berkshire.
2.2. The PCT’s public consultation in 2008 presaged further changes to acute medicine but there was insufficient clarity at that time to allow consultation.
2.3. The Trust has subsequently conducted extensive discussions with staff.
2.4. The Trust has attended and briefed OSC meetings for all the local authorities as part of the preparation for this next stage.
3. Consulting Organisation
3.1. Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust will lead the engagement and consultation on changes to acute medicine services.
3.2. Berkshire East, as the commissioning PCT, supports the engagement and consultation.
4. Information and Consultation Period
4.1. The consultation will commence on 5th May 2009. There will be a press launch on the same day. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, which is the local authority for Heatherwood Hospital, meets on that day. It is planned to give a presentation at this and at each of the other local authority OSC meetings.
4.2. It is planned that the consultation will run for 70 days and close on 13 July 2008. This is the maximum period available to enable the Trust to consider responses and make final decisions for implementation in August 2009 which is a key date for medical staffing issues.
4.3. A range of methods will be used to reach as many of the public and stakeholders as is reasonably possible.
5. Documents
5.1. The process of engagement on the consolidation of services at Wexham Park Hospital, for which there are no options, will be explained in the document that has been prepared for this purpose.
5.2. The information and the options for change on the implementation of those changes will be described in the document.
5.3. There will a questionnaire to help people respond.
5.4. The pre-paid envelopes will be directed to Synovate, an independent organisation engaged to analyse responses (see section 9).
6. Web-site
6.1. The documents will be published on the Trust website on 5th May 2009. The website will also contain other documents and related information relevant to the engagement and consultation process.
6.2. They will also be the facility on the website for people to complete the questionnaire on-line. Such responses will be directed without intervention to Synovate, an independent organisation engaged to analyse responses (see section 9).
6.3. It is proposed that a link will also be provided on the Berkshire East PCT website.
7. Public meetings
7.1. The following public meetings have been arranged:
Date | Time | Location | |
Tue | 26 May 2009 | 10.00 am | Bracknell |
Wed | 27 May | 7.00 pm | Windsor |
Thur | 28 May | 2.00 pm | Ascot |
Wed | 3 June | 2.00 pm | Slough |
Tue | 9 June | 7.00 pm | Ascot |
Thur | 18 June | 2.00 pm | Windsor |
Thurs | 25 June | 7.00 pm | Bracknell |
7.2. There will be additional events for staff and clinicians.
7.3. Presentations will be made to each OSC, which are also meetings open to the
public.
7.4. A separate meeting(s) for OSC members and interested Councillors is being
offered.
8. Engagement Plan
8.1. A detailed Engagement Plan has been prepared. It is a structured approach to ensure that communication of the proposals is disseminated thoroughly and people are informed and given the opportunity to feedback to the Trust. This will ensure minorities, hard to reach groups and known stakeholder groups are consulted.
8.2. Promotion in the media will be undertaken to ensure members of the public are aware of the consultation, can access information and have the opportunity to contribute their views.
9. Independent specialist support
9.1. The Trust has engaged Synovate, an independent organisation, to manage and provide independent analysis of the feedback, as recommended as best practice in the Department of Health guidance.
9.2. Synovate will help draft the questions in the questionnaire and then undertake their own tests to ensure they are balanced and understandable to members of the public.
9.3. There will be a freepost address published in the documents that will deliver responses directly to Synovate. Feedback via the web site will also be forwarded automatically to them.
9.4. Synovate will provide interim feedback to Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to enable arising issues to be responded to during the consultation period and ensure a balanced response is achieved.
9.5. A final report will be delivered shortly after the close of the consultation.
9.6. A telephone helpline to facilitate access to information and responses to the consultation will be provided.
10. Quality assurance
10.1. The following steps have been taken to ensure this consultation is well constructed and managed:
10.2. It has been prepared in compliance with the Department of Health and South Central SHA guidance, which will be available on the Trust website.
10.3. Independent management of the questionnaire and feedback
10.4. Legal advice has been taken.
10.5. The Trust has worked with Berkshire East PCT, its host commissioner.
10.6. South Central SHA has oversight of the entire process.
10.7. Longstanding and ongoing engagement with the each of the interested Overview and Scrutiny Committees has been maintained to endeavour to ensure a valid process has been undertaken.
11. Contingency plans
11.1. There are a range of uncertainties associated with any process like this. The Trusts has undertaken pro-active risk management throughout the course of the engagement. The following are some of the outstanding risks and associated contingency plans that are in place.
Title | Realisation event | Timing | Control | Risk | Contingency plan | |
1 | People wish to influence the consolidation of emergency services at Wexham Park | Public meetings | May to July | Preparation and briefing | High | Implementation on plan |
2 | External local Eg media | Communication | Low | Additional meetings/briefings | ||
3 | Parallel process risk with staff consultation | Complaint about predetermined decision | May to July | Communication | Med | Explain no option to change only to implementation |
4 | Questions without full answers | Public meetings | May to July | Preparation and briefing | Med | Additional meetings/briefings |
5 | Challenge | OSC referral, | May to July | OSC engagement | Med | Temporary implementation |
6 | Challenge | Judicial review | May onwards | OSC engagement | Med | Temporary implementation |
12. Information and Consultation closure and report
12.1. Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust plan to close the formal consultation period after 70 days on 14 July.
12.2. Synovate will prepare an independent report of the feedback and submit it to the Trust immediately following the close of this engagement and consultation.
12.3. The Health Impact Assessment, Equality Impact Assessment and Travel time assessment will be finalised.
12.4. A draft Final Report will be prepared and submitted to the Trust Board within a week.
12.5. The Trust will consider the report and take appropriate decisions.
12.6. The Final Report will be updated and published before 31 July 2009.
12.7. A Final Public Meeting will be held to present the decisions and the Final Report disseminated to stakeholders within the mandatory three-month period after the close of consultation.
Process Document Version 1.5
Prepared by:
Antony Rodden
30 April 2009
74
REPORT TO ADULTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL
Title: SUPPORTING PEOPLE STRATEGY 2009/11
Date: 5 May 2009
Member Reporting: Councillor Simon Dudley
Contact Officer(s): Chris Thomas 01628 796091
Wards Affected: All wards affected.
1.1 The Supporting People Strategy is a requirement of each local authority by the Department of Communities and Local Government. This is to set the overall vision and objectives of the Supporting People programme locally.
1.2 Supporting People teams commission housing related support for vulnerable people from a wide variety of client groups. The support enables them to live independently within the community, to engage in activities and seek training and employment opportunities. The strategy includes a number of key areas and these are detailed below:
1.2.1 The National, Regional and Sub-Regional Context: this includes the National Supporting People Strategy – Independence and Opportunity 2007, the Strategic Housing Role for Local Authorities Sept 2008 and the role of the Homelessness Directorate 2008 in ensuring essential services are maintained for supporting homeless people.
1.2.2 The Corporate Context: this strategy helps deliver the aims of the Borough’s Community Strategy 2007 – 2013. In particular it supports the strategic priorities of the council which are: putting people first; providing value for money and equipping ourselves for the future.
1.2.3 Links to Other Strategies: this strategy helps deliver the strategic aims of the Borough and our partners and links to: the Berkshire East Primary Care Trust Strategic Plan 200811, the Thames Valley Probation Strategy to Reduce Re-Offending 2006, the Adult Plan 2008 – 20, the Children & Young People’s Plan 2008/11 and many others.
1.2.4 Drivers for Future Strategic Direction: these include Local Government Reform, Local Area Agreements, National Indicators, the removal of the ringfencing of Supporting People Grant from 1 April 2009, the economy, the housing crisis and the Transforming Social Care agenda.
2. RECOMMENDATION:
That: the Overview & Scrutiny Panel endorses the Supporting People Strategy 2009/11.
What will be different for residents as a result of this decision? |
The Borough will have a clear commitment to continuing support services for vulnerable people. This will enable them to continue living within the local community and maintain their independence for as long as possible. This will also help reduce crime and create safer neighbourhoods. |
3. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
3.1 Background
3.1.1 The Supporting People programme went live on 1 April 2003. This brought together traditional legacy funding streams which had provided supported housing. As different agencies had sourced funding and developed new services there was no overall plan in any local authority area to ensure there was an appropriate balance of service provision and that all gaps were filled. Supporting People was introduced to put all the funding sources together into one and a body was set up to oversee the future strategic planning of service delivery.
3.1.2 The Supporting People Commissioning Body was a grant condition requirement originally to oversee the delivery of the local programme. It is made up of commissioning managers from the Administering Authority (RBWM), Berkshire East Primary Care Trust and Thames Valley Probation. The Commissioning Body have agreed the wording of this strategy.
The Supporting People Programme Grant, which funds housing related support services, is £1,723,056 for 2009/10 and the Borough provides additional funding to supplement this grant to the value of £374,560. The Supporting People Administration Grant, which funds the team and overheads, is £101,160 for this year.
3.1.4 Supporting People services locally are provided as sheltered and floating support to older people, supported housing and floating support for people with learning disabilities or mental health problems or young people at risk, supported housing and floating support for homeless people or those threatened with homelessness and there is a small service for people with a physical disability. The Borough’s home improvement agency, Repair with Care, is also a Supporting People service.
4. OPTIONS AVAILABLE AND RISK ASSESSMENT
4.1 Options
Option | Comments | Financial Implications | |
1. Endorse the Supporting People Strategy 2009/11 | If agreed the strategy would be published formally on the Borough’s website and this would demonstrate the Borough’s commitment to continuing support services to vulnerable people. This is the preferred recommendation. | This will demonstrate the commitment to continue Supporting People services until 31 March 2011. There may be opportunities to increase funding via bids to the Community Partnership. | |
2. Endorse the Supporting People Strategy 2009/11 with amendments | Members may wish to amend parts of the strategy. However, if these amendments materially affect the strategy, then this may require further consultation and delay. | This would depend on the scale of the amendments – if there were to be a direct impact to a service then the financial impact could be considerable and the future provision for vulnerable people would be likely to bring increased costs. | |
3. Not endorse the Supporting People Strategy 2009/11 | This would leave the council without an up to date strategy. There would not be a clear steer for local vulnerable people, their families, local service providers and the community at large. | Some vulnerable people may need to have most costly interventions to meet their needs. There could be an increase in crime due to the nature of some of the client groups which would have a cost implication |
4.2.1 The risk of not endorsing the strategy are considerable. If support services were not to continue vulnerable people would not have appropriate support or supported accommodation and may be at personal risk within the community or pose a threat or risk to others.
5. CONSULTATIONS CARRIED OUT
5.1 This strategy has been developed using a partnership approach which has included representatives from Berkshire East Primary Care Trust, Thames Valley Probation, Adults Services and Children and Young Peoples Services from within the Borough, service providers, voluntary organisations and feedback from service users.
5.2 The draft strategy has been sent to all key stakeholders, was discussed in detail at Housing Forums in December 2008 and February 2009. It is available for comments on the Supporting People website. All comments have been included wherever possible.
6. COMMENTS FROM OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL
6.1 Text.
7. IMPLICATIONS
The following implications have been addressed where indicated below.
Financial | Legal | Human Rights Act | Planning | Sustainable Development | Diversity & Equality |
ü | ü | N/A | N/A | N/A | ü |
Background Papers:
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx1
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx2
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx3
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx4
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx5
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx6
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Supporting People Strategy Appx7
REPORT TO CABINET
Title: SERVICE MONITORING REPORT
Date: 23 April 2009
Member Reporting: Councillor Hilton
Contact Officer(s): Andrew Brooker, Head of Finance, x6341
Wards affected: All
1. SUMMARY
1.1 This service monitoring report provides a monthly update on service delivery with emphasis on the impact on the council’s financial position. Whilst we are now past the year end, the reported position is projected as year end debtors and creditors are still being processed.
1.2 Services are currently projecting expenditure of £86,039k (down £409k since last month’s £86,448k). The approved estimate is £86,466k (up £139k from last month’s £86,303k, mainly as a result of additional provision for pay awards now being incorporated in service budgets). The expected under spend is therefore £427k (last month: overspend of £145k). See section 3 for more details.
1.3 General balances at year end are projected to be £ 5.245m (last month £4.676m) before carrying forward balances of £237k to 2009-10 – see section 4 for more details.
1.4 The approved capital programme has decreased by £1.792m since last month to £25.921m, which is funded by grants and contributions. Variances are £148k, slippage is £3.494m. See section 5 for more details.
2. RECOMMENDATION: That:
i) The provisional revenue and capital outturn figures in Appendices B and C be noted.
ii) The budget variations contained in sections 3.4 to 3.6 be approved.
iii) The capital programme variances and slippage identified in Appendix C be approved.
iv) The Leader, the Lead member for Children’s Services and the Director of Children’s Services be delegated to review and approve the carry forward of budget to 2009-10 of up to £237k as included in section 4 of the report.
What will be different for residents as a result of this decision? |
The Council is responsible for ensuring that it has put in place the proper arrangements to secure economy, efficiency and effectiveness in its use of resources. If the management of services and their budgets are not regularly reviewed, any and all services for residents could be adversely affected and Council Tax levels may be affected. |
3.1 Background
3.2 As at 31st March 2009, total service expenditure for 2008/9 is expected to be £86,039k (down £409k from last month’s £86,448k).
3.3 Summaries of the Council’s provisional outturn Revenue and Capital financial reports are contained in Appendices A and B respectively. The revenue report includes income and expenditure statements together with a short Directorate report drawing members’ attention to key activities affecting the current and future years.
3.4 Learning & Care reports that its 2008-9 costs are projected to be under spent by £289k (down £352k from last month’s predicted overspend of £63k) on its approved estimate of £48,759k (an increase of £45k on last month’s approved estimate of £48,714k). The budget has been increased to allow for redundancy costs (£35k) and £50k for the recommended 0.3% for pay awards, as agreed at the March 2009 Cabinet meeting, and reduced by £40k from under spends on 2 grant-funded projects (£10k Pump-Priming Grant for Improving Carers Quality of Life, and £30k LPSA Reward Grant for Support to Concessionary Fares), which will be available for reallocation next year.
Children’s Services are expected to be overspent by £192k, a decrease of £276k on last month. Of this, an estimated £50k arises from recovery of staff costs from the General Sure Start Grant, and most of the rest relates to under spends on three Area Based Grant budgets – notably Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.
Adult Social Care is expecting to under spend by £568k (down £168k from an expected under spend last month of £400k). The change mainly relates to projected under spend on 2 grant-funded projects – Transforming Social Care (£75k) and Stroke Care (£82k). This is offset by reduced application of ring-fenced Government grant which will be carried forward to be allocated next year.
3.5 Community Services reports a projected under spend of £65k (down £160k from last month’s anticipated overspend of £95k) from the approved estimate of £22,705k (down £105k from last month’s approved estimate of £22,810k). The budget has been increased because of a £23k Area Based Grant for climate change and £54k for the recommended 0.3% for pay awards. The Licensing Services budget of -£180k has transferred to Community Services from Corporate Services.
There have been some small increases in costs in several areas. The overall saving has mainly been achieved by further reductions in tonnages to landfill, a rate rebate for the Waste Transfer Station and increased licensing income.
3.6 The Chief Executive reports that Corporate Services expenditure is expected to be £14,929k, which is £73k lower (last month: £13k lower) than the approved estimate of £15,002k (increased by £223k since last month’s £14,779k). The budget for Licensing Services has transferred to Community Services (-£180k) and £40k has been added to allow for the approved 0.3% increase on salaries, per the decision at March cabinet.
Increased costs in the Coroner’s Service (£40k), Local Land Charges (£35k), Benefits Fraud (£30k), HR (£9k) and Corporate Performance & Development (£7k) have been more than offset by underspends in Legal Services (-£44k), Exchequer Services (-£20k), Pension Fund (-£43k), Members’ Allowances (-£35k) and Corporate Human Resources (-£12k).
4. OVERALL POSITION
Appendix A shows projected year-end reserves to have increased by £569k to £5.245m from the previous month’s £4.676m, before the commitment to carry forward balances of £237k to 2009-10. There has been an increase in service budgets of £163k, and additional under spends of £572k have been identified this month (see 3.4 to 3.6). The provision for increased salaries of £200k has now been accounted for in the service budget lines, and the contribution from earmarked reserves have been reduced by £40k re. LPSA and PPG grant under spends (see 3.4).
The commitment to carry forward £237k of balances to 2009-10 relates to three grant-funded areas under spent within Learning & Care: CAMHS (£156k), Teenage Pregnancy (£25k) and Extended Services (£56k).
5. CAPITAL
5.1 Capital Budget Movements Since Budget Report
Total capital expenditure for 2008/9 is expected to be £22.575m, which is £3.346m below the approved budget. This is made up of £148k variances and £3.494m slippage and is summarised as follows:-
Exp Inc Net
£'000 £'000 £'000
Approved Budget March 25,921 -15,266 10,655
Variances identified 148 -12 136
Slippage to 2009/10 -3,494 1,948 -1,546
Projected capital programme 2008/2009 22,575 -13,330 9,245
5.2 Projected Capital Variances and Slippage
Community Services reports that the capital budget is likely to be overspent by £11k, with slippage of £1.962m
Learning & Care expect a net underspend of £85k, with slippage of £1.338m
Resources expect a net overspend of £222k, with slippage of £194k.
Further details can be found in Appendix C.
5.3 Overall Programme Status
The project statistics show the following position as at the end of March 2009:
Number of Schemes in Programme 469
Yet to Start 6%
In Progress 34%
(Of which Ongoing Annual Programmes 6%
e.g.. Disabled Facilities Grant)
Completed 46%
Devolved Formula Capital Grant schemes 14%
(Data not available on budgets devolved to schools)
6. OPTIONS AVAILABLE AND RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1 Options
Option | Comments | Financial Implications | |
1. Accept the report | Directors have a responsibility for managing their Services within the Budget approved by Council. Cabinet has limited power to vary those budgets within the overall budget and policy framework or to re-define the priorities agreed when the budget was approved. Cabinet does however have responsibility for considering the impact on future year’s budgets of the decisions taken. | Revenue Capital | |
2. Reject the report | This is not an option as The Local Government Act 2003 requires the Royal Borough to monitor its financial position | Revenue Capital |
Risk assessments are carried out as a matter of course for the delivery of individual services. The main financial risks are included on the Council’s Risk Register. Paragraphs 3.8 to 3.15 discuss the risks associated with the current economic downturn.
The Councils Financial Strategy outlines the measures available to it in the event of a series of events that lead to significant projected budget variances being reported.
7. CONSULTATIONS CARRIED OUT
No specific consultation is carried out as this is a regular monitoring report
8. COMMENTS FROM THE OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL
Relevant components of this report will be considered by each of the four scrutiny panels as part of their next round of meetings.
IMPLICATIONS
9. The following implications have been addressed where indicated below.
Financial | Legal | Human Rights Act | Planning | Sustainable Development | Diversity & Equality |
ü | ü | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Background Papers: Cabinet 26 March 2009 – Monitoring report.
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Service Monitoring Appx1
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Service Monitoring Appx2
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Service Monitoring Appx3
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Service Monitoring Appx4
Meetings 090505 Acshosp Service Monitoring Appx5
- Title: SAFEGUARDING ADULTS
Date: 5th May 2009
Officers Reporting: Ed Thompson, Joint Commissioning Manager (01628 683614) Andy Iddiols, Safeguarding Adults Co-ordinator (01628 683710)
Wards affected: All
1.1 Local Authorities have a responsibility to ensure that there are effective multi-arrangements in place to safeguard vulnerable adults, and to intervene when concerns of possible abuse are raised. The Annual Report 08/09 highlights RBWM Safeguarding Adults activity carried out within the Adult Care Services Team, Community Team for People with Learning Disabilities (CTPLD), Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) & Mental Health Team for Older People (MHTOP).
RECOMMENDATION: That the Panel:
- a) notes the Annual Report;
b) consider any areas they wish to recommend for further work;
3.1 In March 2000, the Department of Health (DoH) issued ‘No Secrets’, a national framework for the development of adult protection work. Adult protection is now more generally referred to as ‘safeguarding adults’.
3.2 There is an East Berkshire Safeguarding Adults Partnership Board, a multi-agency group currently chaired by Bracknell’s Chief Officer for Adults’ Services. The Board is responsible setting the strategic direction and securing senior management engagement across the area. The Board provides leadership in developing policy and standards to deliver improved training and workforce development practice in addressing adult safeguarding issues.
3.3 Safeguarding investigations generally relate to concerns of abuse against an individual, and may relate to physical, sexual, financial, psychological or institutional abuse. In 2008/09 there were 117 investigations into concerns of abuse against individuals. In the last year officers have also conducted a number of “serious concerns about establishments” investigations, where concerns about the overall standard of care in a particular establishment are raised, for example following a high number of complaints about a home care agency, or a number of complaints about a single care home.
3.5 On a local level many initiates to develop the service, raise awareness and improve the level of investigations and recording have been introduced or will come into effect during early 2009/10, such as:
- An RBWM Safeguarding Adults Partnership Board has been established
Recruitment of an Independent chair for the board
Recruitment to a new full time Safeguarding Adults/Dols Manager (interviews 12th May 2009)
A new Safeguarding Adults Module on our IT system (PARIS) to improve investigations and statistical reports
Officers have gave presentations to a considerable number of groups raising awareness and promoting the message that safeguarding adults is ‘Everyone’s Business’
A week of Safeguarding events and promotion is being planned to coincide with the Action on Elder Abuse Day on 15th June 2009
- These items will be looked at in more detail in the body of the report.
4. Summary of Annual Report
- The number of Safeguarding Adult referrals recorded by RBWM for the above period was 117 which compares to 99 last year, 69 in 2006/7, & 74 in 2005/6
95% of these were RBWM Service Users compared to 91% last year and 97% for 2006/7
5% of these were non-RBWM Service Users, but were within the RBWM area.
3 cases were recorded as Self Funded & 2 as Health Funded.
The table below shows the number of safeguarding investigations during 2008/09 to March 2008 with a comparison to the previous year:
Care Group | 08/09 | 07/08 |
Older People Physical Disability Learning Disability Older Peoples’ Mental Health Working Age Mental Health Sensory Substance Misuse | 60 5 18 21 11 1 1 | 50 5 16 17 11 Na na |
Total | 117 | 99 |
- The figures overall reflect increased safeguarding activity in relation to vulnerable adults. This can be related to a greater awareness of adult abuse and improved reporting of alleged abuse within partner agencies and community organisations.
A copy of the full Safeguarding Adults Annual Report is attached as an appendix to this report.
Background Papers:
Annual Report - attached
10. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF ADULT SOCIAL CARE
Meetings 090505 Acshosc Annual Performace Assessment Presentation