PLANNING APPLICATIONS (DECISION)
To consider the Head of Plannings report on planning applications received.
Full details on all planning applications (including application forms, site plans, objections received, correspondence etc.) can be found by accessing the Planning Applications Public Access Module by selecting the following link. http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/web/dc_public_apps.htm
Minutes:
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the order of business as detailed in the agenda be varied.
The Panel considered the Head of Planning’s report on planning applications and received updates in relation to a number of applications, following the publication of the agenda.
NB: *Updates were received in relation to planning applications marked with an asterisk.
Item 1 17/01292/FULL
Hedsor Cottage 11 Maidenhead Court Park Maidenhead SL6 8HN
|
Erection of detached dwelling following demolition of existing garage and annexe.
THIS ITEM WAS WITHDRAWN
|
Item 2 16/03138/FULL
Land At 29 Cranbrook Drive Maidenhead |
New dwelling following demolition of existing extension and garage at No. 29 Cranbrook Drive.
Councillor Ilyas put forward a motion to refuse the Officer’s recommendation. This was seconded by Councillor Bullock. The proposed dwelling due to its scale, height and closeness to the side boundaries of the site would detrimentally impact the open nature of the estate and harm the amenities of the neighbouring property by reason of its overbearing impact. The harm identified would not be significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the benefits of the additional dwelling.
A Named Vote was carried out.
The PANEL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY that the application be REFUSED, against the officer’s recommendation.
(Speakers: The Panel was addressed by Alison Lee, Objector and Antonia Lewis, Applicant).
|
Item 3 17/00680/REM
Land West of Crown Lane Including Part Hines Meadow Car Park And La Roche And The Colonade High Street Maidenhead |
Reserved matters (Landscaping) for redevelopment following demolition of part of Hines Meadow car park, La Roche and The Colonnade to include 162 apartments, 363m2 of Class B1 office space, 1045sqm of retail space (Class A1) and 987sqm of restaurant/cafe space (Class A3), creation of basement car parking, a new footbridge over York Stream and the replacement of the existing vehicle bridge to the existing car park, new pedestrian links, landscaping and alterations to the waterway to create a new public realm as approved under planning permission 12/02762/OUT and varied by 15/04274/VAR [varied as follows: without complying with condition 1 (approved plans) to replace two plans and 65 (completion of waterways) to vary to the following, No dwelling within Block A (as identified on plan 747-2000E) shall be occupied until the works to the York Stream shown on plans 747-2000E and 747-3000B have been completed].
The Officers recommendation to permit the application was put forward byCouncillor Wilson and seconded by Councillor Smith. The proposal is contrary to Local Plan Policies H10 and H11 and NPPF Para 64 Core Principle 4 of the NPPF.
The PANEL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY that the application be PERMITTED as per the officer’s recommendation.
|
Item 4 17/01102/FULL
Huston Cottage Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2ND |
Installation of 7 No. dormer windows.
Councillor Hunt put forward a motion to refuse the Officer’s recommendation. This was seconded by Councillor Burbage. Whilst the overall floor space is significant the infill nature of the proposal i.e. not raising roof line or extending the footprint and small size of the dormers results in a scheme which is not considered disproportionate to the original dwelling house.
Conditions
4. Liaise with applicant regarding obscuring glazing to front windows.
The PANEL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY that the application be APPROVED, against the officer’s recommendation.
(Speakers: The Panel was addressed by Mr Karl Stannard, Applicant). |
Item 5 17/01224/FULL
Riverside Primary School And Nursery Donnington Gardens Maidenhead SL6 7JA |
Provision of 2 additional classrooms.
The Officers recommendation to defer and delegate the application was put forward byCouncillor Wilson and seconded byCouncillor Bullock.
The PANEL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY that the application be DEFERRED AND DELEGATED as per the officer’s recommendation subject to no new material objections being received by 13th June 2017.
|
Supporting documents:
- 06June2017MaidenheadIndex, item 145. PDF 52 KB
- meetings_170606_mdmp_01292_item 1.dotx, item 145. PDF 130 KB
- meeings_170606_mdmp_appendices_item 1_appendix, item 145. PDF 408 KB
- meetings_170606_mdmp_03138_item 2.dotx, item 145. PDF 93 KB
- meeings_170606_mdmp_appendices_item 2_appendix, item 145. PDF 723 KB
- meetings_170606_mdmp_00680_item 3.dotx, item 145. PDF 92 KB
- meeings_170606_mdmp_appendices_item 3_appendix, item 145. PDF 2 MB
- meetings_170606_mdmp_01102_item 4.dotx, item 145. PDF 106 KB
- meeings_170606_mdmp_appendices_item 4_appendix, item 145. PDF 615 KB
- meetings_170606_mdmp_01224_item 5.dotx, item 145. PDF 79 KB
- meeings_170606_mdmp_appendices_item 5_appendix, item 145. PDF 291 KB